Peer Review Policy | International Research Publication House

Peer Review Policy at International Research Publication House

All manuscripts submitted to journals published by International Research Publication House (IRPH) undergo a structured peer review process intended to assess scientific quality, originality, and relevance.

1. Initial Editorial Screening
The Editorial Office conducts a preliminary assessment to evaluate scope alignment, originality, ethical compliance, and basic technical quality. Manuscripts that do not meet minimum requirements may be declined at this stage.

2. Peer Review
Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are evaluated by subject experts drawn from the Editorial Board or by external reviewers. Reviews focus on:

	Technical soundness
	Methodological rigor
	Contribution to the field
	Clarity and organization of presentation

3. Editorial Decision
Based on reviewer reports, the handling Editor may recommend:

	Acceptance with minor revisions
	Revision and resubmission
	Rejection

4. Revision and Final Evaluation
Authors are required to respond to reviewer comments within a stipulated timeframe. Revised manuscripts may be reassessed before a final editorial decision is made.

5. Publication
Manuscripts accepted for publication are scheduled for publication in a forthcoming issue, subject to journal-specific publication timelines.